The typo turned a political collectible into a consumer complaint. The dispute also shows why fine print matters when celebrity-branded merchandise is sold through licensed sellers.
Tim Petit and Melanie Petit, a Rhode Island couple, bought a $640 limited-edition Trump-branded watch as a gift. But the watch arrived with “RUMP” on the face instead of Trump, missing the “T,” and the company offered an $800 apology in store credit — a coupon for its own site, not cash.
WJAR reported from Providence, R.I., that Tim said the Pink Inauguration First Lady model was one of 250 made. The couple’s complaint is about more than a typo: it tests what shoppers can expect when limited-run political merchandise arrives visibly wrong.
A pricey gift goes sideways
According to WJAR reporting carried by CNN Newsource and local stations including KPTV and WKYT, Tim Petit bought the Donald Trump-branded watch for Melanie after hearing a radio advertisement that featured Trump’s voice.
Tim told the station the ad made him curious enough to visit gettrumpwatches.com. He chose the Pink Inauguration First Lady model, saying it looked attractive and seemed like something his wife would like.
The price was $640. The draw, Tim said, was also scarcity: he described the watch as a limited edition, one of only 250 made.
That is why the error landed differently than a routine shipping problem. On a product built around a famous name, the name on the face is not decoration. It is central to what the customer paid for.
The typo was immediately visible
Melanie Petit told WJAR she noticed right away that the watch did not say “Trump” as expected. She said the face read “R-U-M-P.”
She liked the style of the watch, according to the report, but the missing letter made the item stand out for the wrong reason. Tim said he was disappointed because the purchase was meant to be a special gift for his wife.
The Petits also questioned how the item made it through the process. Melanie wondered how a mistake so obvious could be handled and shipped without being caught.
Tim told the station he believed someone in the licensing operation needed to know that “someone’s dropped the ball big time.”
The apology kept them shopping
The company eventually responded, according to WJAR. The Petits said it apologized, planned to replace the watch and offered them an $800 coupon to buy something else on the site.
On paper, $800 is more than the $640 purchase price. But the distinction matters: the offer was store credit, not an $800 cash payment.
That can divide customer expectations. Some shoppers may see a replacement plus credit as a meaningful gesture, especially if the company is trying to make up for an embarrassing mistake.
Others may see a coupon as limited compensation because it only helps if the customer wants to spend more money or place another order with the same seller. The available reporting does not spell out every condition attached to the coupon, including expiration dates, exclusions or whether it could be combined with other offers.
Fine print shifts responsibility
The Trump branding is part of why the story spread, but WJAR reported an important distinction about who is behind the product.
The site describes its products as the “official watches of President Trump,” according to the report. Its fine print says it licenses the name and likeness.
The disclaimer also says the watches are not designed, manufactured, distributed or sold by Donald J. Trump, the Trump Organization or their respective affiliates or principals. It says the products have nothing to do with any political campaign.
That separation is common in celebrity and political merchandise. A public figure’s name can appear prominently in marketing while manufacturing, fulfillment and customer service are handled by a licensee or vendor.
Why a missing letter mattered
The “RUMP” misprint is the kind of mistake that travels fast online because it is simple, visual and politically charged. But the consumer issue would still exist even without the joke.
Limited-edition merchandise often asks buyers to pay more because the item is presented as scarce, commemorative or collectible. In this case, Tim said the watch was one of 250 made, which made accuracy and presentation part of the value.
There is a possible counterpoint: some production mistakes can become collectible because they are unusual. Misprinted coins, stamps and memorabilia have sometimes attracted attention for that reason.
That possibility does not erase the Petits’ complaint. A buyer who ordered a gift did not ask for an error, and a defect does not become an acceptable substitute just because someone else might later find it interesting.
What still is not clear
The public reporting leaves several practical questions unanswered. It is not clear how the typo passed inspection, whether other watches in the same limited edition had the same missing letter, or which vendor in the supply chain was responsible for the watch face.
It is also unclear whether the replacement watch had arrived when the reports were published, or whether the Petits used or planned to use the $800 coupon.
For shoppers, the broader lesson is straightforward: limited-edition and politically branded items deserve close scrutiny. Order confirmations, photos of defects and customer-service messages can matter if a product arrives wrong.
The Petits’ watch was supposed to carry a famous name. Instead, one missing letter turned a $640 gift into a public complaint about quality control, licensed branding and whether store credit is enough when the product itself is wrong.
Leave a Reply